The ECO-Kindle? It Really Isn’t Simple.
April 20th, 2012So there have been some reports recently (you can find a good summary here) saying that the Kindle is more environmentally friendly than buying real paper books. I’m inclined to think it may be true on my first rule-of-thumb which is simply cost. These days the cost of something is, well OK a lot of it is tax and maybe the less said about that the better. But leaving aside the tax we pay for two things in a product, people’s time to design it, make it and sell it and the raw materials (including the usually petroleum derived energy) used to manufacture and transport it. The more you pay for it the more it is likely to have cost the environment. Just a rule of thumb but using it I equate my Kindle, price wise, with maybe a dozen or so books.
But hang on. What bit of the environment are we worried about and why? If we are worried principally about green-house gas then perhaps we should think again. If I cut down a tree which has sequestered a truck-load of carbon, the CO2 cost depends on what I do next. Worst clearly is burn it and not plant a new one. However if I make the tree’s carbon into books, store my treasured tomes carefully AND plant a new tree, the CO2 cost might even be negative. We have a net sequestration of atmospheric CO2 and the Kindle doesn’t look so good.
The key question now becomes ‘how much energy is used in the manufacture of the Kindle device compared to the books?’ and here’s the problem for the paper, it may only be a fifth of the total CO2 used in the manufacture that’s actually sequestered in the pages. The rest is burned during the manufacture and transportation. So I pick up my Kindle again with a smug glow? Not so fast. These days we have some control over our fuel sources, perhaps I can choose to pay a bit extra for a renewable-energy manufactured book transported by renewable-generated electric truck and I’m back to a net sequestration of CO2. Breaks my rule of thumb this extra cost but I think it may be an exception. Then there are the other impacts of even sustainable paper production, (lack of) bio-diversity in managed forests and waste products of production, a good discussion can be found at lovelyasatree.com.
I don’t think we are finished yet and some readers out there will spot more complexities I have missed. Working out what is green and what is not can be fiendishly difficult. Still I really don’t think anyone should feel guilty buying a Kindle. Hmm then I have to buy a case to stop it getting scratched – after all I want it to last – buying a new one each year would not be earth friendly (sorry Amazon). I look round at the case material alternatives, Neoprene, Silicone, Leather…. doesn’t sound good – but hold it, there is a green alternative here as well, hemp! Take a look at these Kindle cases from UK designers Tuff-Luv.


















